.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Methods for Using Kent’s Repertory in Practice Kent’s Repertory is built on a clear, deductive framework—moving from the most general symptoms (“generals”) to the most particular signs—so that the prescriber can home in on the simillimum efficiently. 1. Grasp the Repertory’s Structure - Deductive LoRead more
Methods for Using Kent’s Repertory in Practice
Kent’s Repertory is built on a clear, deductive framework—moving from the most general symptoms (“generals”) to the most particular signs—so that the prescriber can home in on the simillimum efficiently.
1. Grasp the Repertory’s Structure
– Deductive Logic: Always think “general → particular.” You begin with broad rubrics (e.g., modalities) before zooming into organ- or sensation-specific rubrics.
– Chapter Order:
1. Mind (mental and emotional states)
2. Organ/system-specific chapters (e.g., Head, Chest, Skin…)
3. Generalities (overall modalities, food, weather affinities, diatheses)
– Alphabetical Rubrics: Within each chapter, rubrics are sorted A→Z for quick lookup.
2. Systematic Case-Taking & Symptom Classification
1. Record the Totality: List every symptom—mental, physical, and modalities.
2. Partition into:
– Generals: Temperature desires/aversions, time modalities, emotional states
– Particulars: Localized pains, specific sensations, organ complaints
3. Rubric Selection Workflow
1. Mind Chapter First: Emotional/mental symptoms often guide the simillimum.
2. Proceed Chapter by Chapter: Identify matching rubrics in Head, Throat, Chest, etc.
3. Consult Generalities Last: Capture broad modalities or constitutional symptoms that didn’t fit elsewhere.
4. Building the Repertorial Chart
– List Remedies under each selected rubric.
– Tally Appearances: A remedy appearing in multiple key rubrics gains priority (Kent didn’t assign numbers—clinical judgment fills the gap).
– Note Keynotes: Unusual, characteristic symptoms take precedence over common ones.
5. Remedy Verification
– Materia Medica Cross-Check: Once you have a short list, delve into each remedy’s detailed profile.
– Match Totality: Ensure mental, general and physical rubrics align with the remedy picture.
6. Follow-Up & Adjustment
– Observe the Patient: Look for a homeopathic response (improvement in the leading symptoms).
– Refine as Needed: If the chief complaint recurs or new modalities emerge, repeat the rubric-selection process focusing on the new totality.
Additional Pathways You Might Explore
See less– Digital integrations: MacRepertory, RADAR, CARA—computerized tools built on Kent’s scheme.