.
Be the first to react
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
The repertory you use in homeopathy isn’t a stand-alone work but a distillation of decades (even centuries) of provings, clinical observations and materia medica research. Its “sources” can be grouped into four broad categories: 1. Provings & Pathogenetic Trials • Hahnemann’s original provings (Read more
The repertory you use in homeopathy isn’t a stand-alone work but a distillation of decades (even centuries) of provings, clinical observations and materia medica research. Its “sources” can be grouped into four broad categories:
1. Provings & Pathogenetic Trials
• Hahnemann’s original provings (Materia Medica Pura) and later trials by Hering, Curie, Lippe, Kent and others.
• All the symptom‐recording experiments—often on healthy volunteers—where minute doses of a substance produce a spectrum of signs and sensations that ultimately feed into rubrics.
2. Clinical Experience & Case Records
• Boenninghausen’s Therapeutic Pocketbook, which categorized remedies by organ affinity and modalities, based on thousands of real‐world prescriptions.
• Kent’s Repertory, built from his own practice notes and cases he deemed “characteristic,” refined over decades of consultations.
• Subsequent repertories (Boger’s Boenninghausen, Clarke’s Dictionary, Allen’s Encyclopaedia) each adding or pruning rubrics based on clinical follow-up.
3. Materia Medica & Toxicology
• The rich, descriptive texts (Hahnemann, Jahr, Allen, Clarke, Phatak) that detail every symptom, mental state and concomitant—often derived from poison-control records, veterinary reports and historical use.
• Toxicological reports and pharmacological data, especially for plant, mineral and animal substances that impact human physiology in low or “proving” doses.
4. Scholarly Commentary & Cross-Referencing
• Journals and repertory commentaries (Hpathy, British Homeopathic Journal, Homeopathic Links) that debate rubric definitions and suggest new ones.
• Modern computerized editions (CARA, MacRepertory, RADAR) which merge multiple repertories and add indexing, cross-references and weighting based on rubric frequency and clinical “strength.”
By appreciating these layered sources—provings, case experience, materia medica detail and ongoing scholarly refinement—you’ll understand why repertory rubrics are both powerful and in constant evolution.
See less