Describe the limitation of Boenninghausen Repertory.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In short, The Boenninghausen Repertory is a homeopathic repertory that was developed by Dr. Clemens von Boenninghausen, a student of Hahnemann, based on the concept of complete symptom and concomitance. It is a concise and logical repertory that uses a unique structure of grading remedies accordingRead more
In short, The Boenninghausen Repertory is a homeopathic repertory that was developed by Dr. Clemens von Boenninghausen, a student of Hahnemann, based on the concept of complete symptom and concomitance. It is a concise and logical repertory that uses a unique structure of grading remedies according to their degree of similarity to the case. However, it also has some limitations that may affect its applicability and reliability in some situations. Some of the limitations are:
1. It does not include many mental symptoms, as Boenninghausen believed that they were not essential for prescribing, unless they were very characteristic or peculiar. This may make it difficult to use the repertory for cases where the mental state is prominent or important.
See less2. It does not have many sub-rubrics or specifications for the modalities, locations, sensations, and concomitants of the symptoms. This may make it challenging to find the most suitable remedy for cases where the details are significant or distinctive.
3. It does not contain many new remedies that have been proved or clinically verified after Boenninghausen’s time. This may limit the scope of the repertory for cases where the modern remedies are indicated or preferable.
4. It does not follow the Hahnemannian method of case-taking and analysis, as Boenninghausen adopted a different approach based on his own experience and observation. This may create some inconsistency or confusion for homeopaths who follow the original teachings of Hahnemann.
5. It does not provide any explanation or reference for the source of the symptoms or the grading of the remedies. This may affect the accuracy and credibility of the repertory for cases where the origin or reliability of the information is questionable.
6. Limited no. of medicine.
7. Concomitants are not mentioned properly.
8. No indexing of chapter.
9. No separate heading for some chapter.
10 Well proved medicine are not given.