.
Synthesis is the product of a continuous teamwork with superb technology. It is the printed version of RADAR computer programme. This repertory has set a new standard by adding many information and continuous verification by its users. It is the latest among all repertories. Synthesis repertory is bRead more
Synthesis is the product of a continuous teamwork with superb technology. It is the printed version of RADAR computer programme. This repertory has set a new standard by adding many information and continuous verification by its users. It is the latest among all repertories. Synthesis repertory is based on 6th American edition of Kent’s repertory, and contains all its rubrics and remedies maintaining its philosophical background also. The synthesis repertory linked to the RADAR project. RADAR was first developed as research project at the University of Namur (Belgium) under the supervision of Jean Fichefet. He was the professor of mathematics in the department of computer science at the same university. He became interested in homoeopathy after the miraculous cure of his son by homoeopathic medicine. Dr. Frederik Schroyens became the homoeopathic co-ordinator for the RADAR project. He had outlined a request for collaboration in the year 1986. Dr. Frederik Schroyens and his team sent charter to all leading homoeopaths who were concerned with evolution of homoeopathy through the software version. Since 1987 Synthesis is used as a database software programme, i.e. RADAR in daily practice of leading homoeopaths. This book is primarily based on 6th edition of Kent’s repertory and has been commented upon and improved from time to time by various leading practitioners worldwide.
See less
Limitations or disadvantage of repertory: 1. Repertoryis basically an index, never suggest a final choice. 2. Different repertories have different philosophy and construction. 3. New additions to materiamedica cannot be accommodated in repertory. 4. Many rubrics are not represented well. 5. No guidaRead more
Limitations or disadvantage of repertory:
1. Repertoryis basically an index, never suggest a final choice.
See less2. Different repertories have different philosophy and construction.
3. New additions to materiamedica cannot be accommodated in repertory.
4. Many rubrics are not represented well.
5. No guidance about potency, dose and repetition.
6. Nosodes and sarcodes not represented well.
7. If the physician makes mistakes in interpretation, and just counting the symptoms and markes, he will fail.
8. Use of repertory cannot be independent of knowledge of materia medica,organon or clinical subjects.